This article emphasizes that the core of the Electoral bond judgment lies not merely in election reform but in reinforcing equal access to political processes, a foundational aspect of Representative Democracy. The analysis draws on John Hart Ely’s framework for judicial review, which promotes the safeguarding of minority interests and ensuring fairness in political representation. This judicial approach underscores a broader concern for preserving democratic integrity through process-oriented review, ensuring equal participation and preventing the distortion of political systems by entrenched interests.
The post Preserving democratic integrity: Analyzing Electoral Bonds judgment in light of Ely’s Judicial Review Framework Part-I appeared first on Law and Other Things.